Belski Among the Ruins
By Judith Bolton-Fasman
The English Disease
By Joseph Skibell
Algonquin, 236 pp., $23.95
Early in Joseph Skibell's satirical novel The English Disease, Charles Belski, the book's jaded narrator,
notes that the heart of a human embryo is a "single pulsating organ,
separating into its articulated chambers as the fetus grows, its two halves
partitioned permanently only at the moment of birth, when the lungs begin to
function and the hole between the halves, the ductus arteriosum, closes."
What is presented as a "violent moment for the fetus," becomes an
intense metaphor for Belski, a man who is angry and depressed over his ethnic
and religious disaffection from all things Jewish. "It was thought that
the contemplation of actual ruins would make one's own ruined life seem less
hateful, and that these dilapidated but still beautiful structures might
suggest to the sensitive melancholiac the possibility of finding beauty in his
own misery, indeed as essential to it." The ruin at hand is Belski's
marriage to the Gentile Isabelle. The attempt at an immediate cure is a tour of
ruins in the Western United States including Chaco Canyon and Mesa Verde.
To understand Belski it is best to begin at the beginning in Karkel, Texas,
a one-synagogue town. Belski's early Jewish education was directed by the
small-minded Rabbi Kleinblatt whose lessons consisted of learning to recognize
and pronounce the Hebrew alphabet without benefit of meaning or context. The
letters were empty shells. The metaphorical division of heart and mind brought
about its own melancholia—a kind of Hebrew disease.
Belski's obsession with his assimilation and his bad luck with women infuses
his work as a musicologist. He focuses on the music of Gustav Mahler and
Richard Wagner, acutely aware of the former's apostasy and the latter's
virulent anti-Semitism. But it's the women whom Belski claims "have always
been the source of my greatest unhappiness, beginning with Alma Mahler."
Alma Mahler is Mahler's beautiful, passionate wife who at her husband's behest
stopped composing her own music. She "stuck to the terms of this
idiosyncratic agreement while flagrantly disregarding the weightier ones of her
marriage vow." Skibell brilliantly conveys the same tension in Belski's
marriage when Isabelle violates their own idiosyncratic agreement by pleading
for a Christmas tree. Belski acquiesces a bit more each year and his spiritual
alienation deepens.
"In each subsequent year, the tree grew in shape and size, so that
every December, I felt further and further oppressed by it."
"The pinnacle of this oppression, or rather its nadir—tying a fir to
the top of our car as though it were a deer carcass . . . was for me a
complicated and disturbing act."
Again he experiences a violent moment as another part of his heart becomes
partitioned permanently.
This is made painfully clear when he visits Auschwitz, which he comes to see
as the tragic and ugly ruins of his Judaism. Belski's companion on the trip is
only referred to as Leibowitz, a fellow musicologist whose buffoonish manner
obscures the deeper truths that he often speaks. It is as difficult to see past
Leibowitz's grotesqueness and gluttony as it is to be confronted with Kracow's
kitschy memorialization of its murdered Jews. Memories of pre-Holocaust Jewish
life are preserved on a tape loop and depicted in stereotypical cardboard
figures displayed in what was once the city's main synagogue. Things are
decidedly worse in Auschwitz, where a tour of the barracks and crematoria ends
with a stop at a Disneyesque gift shop.
Skibell's observations are a sharp commentary that is punctuated by
Leibowitz's far-fetched yet somehow coherent depiction of assimilation as
represented by the Marx Brothers. According to Leibowitz, the Marx Brothers
take on anti-Semitic caricatures "as a way of implicating and condemning
not only themselves as Jews but also their anti-Semitic tormentors." In
Leibowitz's model each of the four brothers represents various stages of
assimilation, and it is Zeppo's representation of total assimilation with which
Belski reluctantly and frighteningly identifies.
It is for that reason that Belski considers leaving Isabelle again. Belski's
dilemma manifests itself as a verse from Genesis describing Esau's Canaanite
wives as a source of "bitterness" to his parents that Belski can't
purge from his mind. But perhaps it is an alternate translation regarding
Esau's choice of wives as a "spiritual rebellion" that resonates
after Isabelle announces that she wants to seriously explore Judaism and
perhaps even to convert.
What happens next is a witty subversion of Belski's own rebellion and
doubts. Although the last quarter of the book rushes towards a conclusion, on
the way it takes on New Age Judaism as well as its more traditional counterparts
with equal measures of equanimity and parody. In Skibell's able hands, Belski's
dour fixation eventually gives way to cautious joy.
Reprinted from the Boston Globe